What rate of return can we realistically expect from our investments?
7%? 8% 12?!
This is no academic brain teaser to anyone saving for retirement or a down payment. It’s not easy to get right, and getting it right is critically important.
Guess too low, and you end up with a dour view of your chances of making your financial goal. Guess too high, and you could end up in dire straights.
If it’s any consolation to the amateur investor, the pros often can’t agree on rate of return either.
Fighting over Investment Returns in California
In California a debate on this issue has been sparked by the chief actuary of the massive $227 billion California Public Employees’ Retirement System (Calpers) pension plan. He wanted to lower its expected rate of return from 7.75% to 7.5%, but the fund’s board, under pressure from local municipalities who would have had to contribute more, voted against that. Over 20 or 30 years, even that small a change can have a significant impact on your final balance.
Such a drop would require cash-strapped local governments all across the state contribute more in pension plan payments, and they fought that idea hard.
Calper’s expectations are not especially high. According to survey data compiled by the National Association of State Retirement Administrators (NASRA), the median assumed rate of return among the largest public funds is 8%, though some funds use estimates as high as 8.5%, and others as low as 7%.
According to Wilshire Associates, the range among the largest corporate pension plans is 6.5% to 8.75%, with an average of 8% as well. Among corporate plans, which have seen some significant changes in the pension accounting rules, the average has come down significantly in recent years. In 2000, it was 9.5% according to Wilshire Associates.
What’s interesting is that public and corporate pension plans come out in the same spot on their return estimates despite fairly different average asset allocations.
Big Pension Plans Calculate Their Returns
Public plans today are far more heavily invested in alternative investment classes, like hedge funds and private equity funds, and in real estate than their private sector counterparts. Major corporate plans, meanwhile have gone much more heavily into cash.
Here is the average asset allocation among the public plans surveyed by NASRA:
29.0% bonds/fixed income
5.9% real estate
8.7% alternative investments
Wilshire reports that the average corporate plan has the following asset allocation:
34% fixed income
1.7% real estate
2.2% alternative investments
Based solely on their projections for indexed investments in their asset class mix, without any premium for potential “outperformance” by their investment mangers, Wilshire puts a rate of return of 6.5% on the public plan’s asset allocation and 6.4% on the corporate plans. Both figures fall significantly below the pension plan manager’s 8% estimates.
What’s your number? And do you feel you’ve gotten to the right one?